mirror of
https://gitea.com/gitea/runner.git
synced 2026-11-15 04:13:42 +00:00
enhance(cache): scope cache entries by ref like GitHub (#1361)
Cache entries were only scoped by repository, so an entry a pull request saved could be restored on the default branch, for example through a `restore-keys` prefix. Entries now carry the ref of the job that saved them. As on GitHub ([Restrictions for accessing a cache](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/dependency-caching#restrictions-for-accessing-a-cache)), a job restores entries of its own ref first, then of its pull request's base branch, then of the default branch. Pull request events are scoped by their pull request number. Entries saved before this change are no longer restored and expire through `cache.retention`, so caches start cold once after the upgrade. Runners sharing a cache, and an external `cache-server`, should be upgraded together. Co-authored-by: silverwind <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: silverwind <[email protected]> Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1361 Reviewed-by: silverwind <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: JorgeDLMV <[email protected]>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
ca8e9c3c64
commit
261ab374ce
10 files changed
+226
-119
No files matched your search
@@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ Use `uses: builtin:checkout` to check out a repository without downloading `acti
|
||||
|
||||
Each runner starts its own cache server, so runners do not share cached entries. A runner in a container on the jobs' Docker daemon attaches itself to each job network, so jobs reach its cache without extra setup.
|
||||
|
||||
As on GitHub, a job restores caches saved for its own ref, its pull request's base branch and the default branch, so a cache saved by a pull request is only restored by that pull request.
|
||||
|
||||
**Sharing a cache between runners**
|
||||
|
||||
Run one `gitea-runner cache-server` and point every runner at it, using the same secret everywhere, for example from `openssl rand -hex 32`:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user