Continuation of #362.
In addition to fixing merge conflicts and the `fmt.Errorf` issue from the previous version, I've also added a set of tests to cover some basic usage of `initInputs`
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Baylac Jacqué <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1076
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: h7x4 <[email protected]>
Completes the runner side of the cancellation flow, superseding #825. Two parts:
### 1. Report cancellations correctly (`fix`)
When `Reporter.Close` ran with the state still `UNSPECIFIED` and the reporter's
context had been cancelled, the synthesised final state attributed the job to
`RESULT_FAILURE` with an "Early termination" log row — misreporting a
cancellation as a generic failure. `Close` now detects the cancelled context
and finalizes the task as `RESULT_CANCELLED`.
### 2. Advertise the `cancelling` capability (`feat`)
[actions-proto-go v0.6.0](https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go) adds a
`capabilities` field to `RegisterRequest`/`DeclareRequest`, so the runner can
now tell the server it understands the transitional cancelling state:
- Bumps `gitea.dev/actions-proto-go` to `v0.6.0`.
- Adds a single `RunnerCapabilities()` source of truth exposing
`CapabilityCancelling`.
- Sends `Capabilities` on both register and declare.
With this the server records `HasCancellingSupport` and can rely on the runner
running post-step cleanup before a task is finalized as `RESULT_CANCELLED`.
## Compatibility
Wire-compatible against older servers: the new field uses a previously unused
field number (8 on `RegisterRequest`, 3 on `DeclareRequest`) and the client uses
the binary protobuf codec, so a server predating the field silently ignores it —
registration and declaration succeed and the feature simply stays off. It
activates only once both runner and server are on v0.6.0.
## Server side
The matching Gitea change (read `GetCapabilities()`, persist
`HasCancellingSupport`) is a separate PR against `gitea/gitea`.
Supersedes #825.
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1016
Reviewed-by: Zettat123 <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: wxiaoguang <[email protected]>
The runner already enforces Gitea v1.21+ (see the `connect.CodeUnimplemented` check in `daemon.go`), so several shims kept for v1.20 compatibility have been dead since 2023:
- `compatibleWithOldEnvs` — the `GITEA_DEBUG`, `GITEA_TRACE`, `GITEA_RUNNER_CAPACITY`, `GITEA_RUNNER_FILE`, `GITEA_RUNNER_ENVIRON`, `GITEA_RUNNER_ENV_FILE` env vars (superseded by the config file)
- `VersionHeader` (`x-runner-version`) and the `version` param of `client.New`
- `AgentLabels` field in `RegisterRequest` (replaced by `Labels`)
Also replaces a verbose `strings.TrimRightFunc` closure with `strings.TrimRight(s, "\r\n")` in the log row parser.
---
This PR was written with the help of Claude Opus 4.7
---------
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/978
Reviewed-by: Nicolas <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: silverwind <[email protected]>
I used to be able to do something like `./act_runner register --instance https://gitea.com --token testdcff --name test` on GitHub Actions Runners, but act_runner always asked me to enter instance, token etc. again and requiring me to use `--no-interactive` including passing everything per cli.
My idea was to extract the preset input of some stages to skip the prompt for this value if it is a non empty string. Labels is the only question that has been asked more than once if validation failed, in this case the error path have to unset the values of the input structure to not end in a non-interactive loop.
_I have written this initially for my own gitea runner, might be useful to everyone using the official runner as well_
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/682
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: Christopher Homberger <[email protected]>
- Remove the else clause in the `registerInteractive` function, and unconditionally log "Runner registered successfully."
- Change the return value in the `doRegister` function from `nil` to `ctx.Err()`.
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/288
Co-authored-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
- Add context parameter to `registerNoInteractive`, `registerInteractive`, and `doRegister` functions
- Remove the creation of a new context in `doRegister`, now using the passed context instead
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/286
Co-authored-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: Bo-Yi Wu <[email protected]>
### It's a "simple dirty fix" and I don't have any experiences with Go, so if this doesn't match your coding compliance, please adjust the code as needed
I'm using bash scripts to register a token
`./act_runner/act_runner register --no-interactive --name runner$number --instance http://localhost:3000 --token $token`
But when a token is invalid, the command still returns 0, which is not practical for automation.
A simple non-zero return would be more convenient for power users and developers.
Co-authored-by: Markus Löffler <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/228
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: MarkusLoeffler01 <[email protected]>
Co-committed-by: MarkusLoeffler01 <[email protected]>
bircniandsilverwind
h7x4andFélix Baylac Jacqué
Renovate BotandNicolas
Lunny Xiaoandsilverwind
silverwindandChristopherHX
telackeyandtechknowlogick
Jason Song
Bo-Yi Wu
sillyguodongandJason Song
